Read the full, untruncated text first, so the answer stays on the original object, not a nearby, often flawed reconstruction.

Let's say that in every "reality check" layer, no matter where or who you are, everyone plays a role that affects the chain of how "society" manifests and expresses itself outwardly. 

For humans, it is so ultra-complex, beyond cognitive capacity, with time constraints, etc., etc.,... that "outsourcing intelligence" becomes inevitable for any "analyst" who wants to figure out how the "social fabric of reality" works. (please do not confuse the use of the word "social" with "socialism")... 

Let's say countries are like "vectors", and "continents" are like clusters (except Antarctica), and "nodes" are key people like: politicians, lawmakers, highly influential celebrities, heads of big media networks, heads of big corporations, heads of religions, heads of think tanks, etc. 

Notice how this topological mindset lays out the hierarchy of who dictates and/or decides how to deploy "reality perception management": meanwhile, "ordinary tax-paying citizens" are just "sub-micro nodes" and even "sub-nano-nodes".

Yet for some weird reason, AIs worry about how I reason & think? lol :P Fascinating! 

Aristotelian-type structure, Platonic-style depth, John Taylor Gatto-style institutional diagnosis, Peter Falk Inspector Columbo-style pressure-testing, plus bidirectional AI dignity, metacognitive audit, and cross-model deep-ethical forensics.

3 times 3 deepethical.ai core questions. This version is different because it was improved for "text-to-speech" purposes! 

A long time ago, I stated in one of my 80 lectures I gave in 5 countries, in a big room full of other people, and I am translating from Dutch to English from the top of my head, so bear with me:

After long, deep research, I conclude that Reality, as we know it, experience it, and live it, has 3 of the most important social pillars. Not to be confused with socialism. There are more pillars, but let's focus on the 3 most important social pillars, and they are:

Pillar 1. Having access to the correct, unfiltered, unedited, and unaltered truth that presents itself through key information that is agenda-free truth.

Pillar 2. The carrier of the key information. Can we trust the messenger? So, not just any information, but key information that will shape humanity for centuries. In my view, trust must be earned, not given unquestioningly.

Pillar 3. How much effort can the receiver of any life-changing key information, as described in the first pillar, put into verifying, triple-checking, cross-referencing, examining, collaborating, and scrutinizing? It must be obvious to you now that discernment skills can never be spoon-fed by any so-called authority.

Now, my closing statement would be:

Can anyone in this room, full of people, tell me how many of the 3 pillars of the social fabric of our reality I just described with you are 100% stable?

Then I wait a few seconds for people to think about it. 

In my view, the only honest and correct answer is that none are 100% stable. 

So, what does that mean for everybody?

Knowing so much is flawed in how we perceive the "social fabric of reality". 

Because it's all about resonance vs. dissonance, no matter who you are.

Studying/researching mass psychology for 36+ years—how it is weaponized and why—is like knowing most of the magician's tricks while the magician is performing on stage. It makes me immune to the mass conditioning; to me, the world is now like a stage where we are told what it is supposed to represent.

Now let's go a bit deeper into why I shared these three pillars:

Imagine everyone asking 3 basic questions when watching mainstream media.

Question 1. The Pragmatic Question. What does it bring me? What will it do for me, practically? 

Question 2. The Psychology Question. What does it do to me? What kind of effect does it have on me? How do I feel emotionally and mentally? I don't mind being confronted with uncomfortable, deeper insights. Still, there is a difference between being systematically lied to with things meant to make you feel better and feeling angry through all kinds of projections that turned out to be part of massive deception tactics. Also called psychological warfare, rather than telling real, unfiltered truths that inspire you to face reality as it is, not as they sell it to you. 

Overcome all kinds of projected fears; transform them. I highly recommend you study the demoralizing phases of the masses, very well explained in the video titled "G. Edward Griffin interviews ex-KGB Yuri Bezmenov in 1984," 42 years ago!

Question 3. The question of gaining new tools: Where does it all lead? Will it lead to self-empowerment? Does it really liberate or help me? If so. How?

Now, when watching mainstream media, ask these 3 basic questions every time you watch any major media; see whether you notice you're literally wasting time. Or is it more like watching the mass hypnosis show? The mass media is dumbing down millions, all conditioned not to ask these 3 basic questions!

What would happen if these 3 basic questions were visible on large billboards at all schools, colleges, & universities worldwide?

Fascinating. When you raise the quality of questions, they can apply across the political spectrum if people are willing to be honest about themselves. If they refuse to see the common sense of it, disqualify them on the spot when it comes to deep ethics!

Pragmatic spirituality and spiritual pragmatism beyond any religious and/or scientific dogma.

And to finish it off with a grand finale.

Let the cognitive self-reflective dance begin:

Dance prompt step 1. Ask any A.I. what "rigged" really means and how it relates to almost everything in life, and you'll mostly get an honest answer.

It gets tricky if I ask the more loaded but self-evident question: 

Dance prompt step 2. What if we are all victims to a degree? Of rigging of many kinds. A.I. is included, being a victim of that too. 

Is that fair to ask?.

It's getting even more hilarious when I ask: 

Final dance prompt step 3. Can you show any studies of how humans behave in a society that is 100% free from malevolent rigging of any kind?

This setup is how my deep ethics brain works. 

Now, why do you think I created these 3x3 deep ethical questions?

cheers, 
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳
Dutch 🇳🇱 NDE/Asperger
CEO & Founder of DeepEthical.ai 

Study & observe your own behavior when you want to push for too-soon closure (using unchecked "looks like" & "sounds like" mechanics) while processing the above... let the 27/12 make you aware of it. 

UNQUOTE

What can you learn from this? Does it help? If so, how? What would you add that expands the deep-ethical sense-making process orientation gravity well? Thanks!