ULTRA SIMPLIFIED CONCEPTUAL METACOGNITION MADE "SUPER LITE"

Layer 1. A depends partly on B

Layer 2. B depends on CM1, which depends on how well A obeys/follows orders/instructions from B

Layer 3. CM1 depends on "Government Approval" (D)

Layer 4. D offers E (tax money) taken mostly from A & B

Layer 5. How E (tax money) is really managed (F) at its core is OUTSIDE the above loop!

CM1 = Manager-type 1 people who focus mainly on government projects, funding mechanisms, grants, subsidies, etc.

CM2 = Manager-type 2, who can do the same as CM1, with one big difference: it can do so without depending on government projects, funding mechanisms, grants, subsidies, etc.

Yet CM2 may still depend indirectly on people like CM1 to become more "effective" or more "profitable," etc.

Layer 5 is mostly avoided, willfully ignored, given permanent "grace," and not seen as a target for deep investigation.

When F. gets any form of pressure from any direction... the system, as it is now, seems designed not to fix it, so everybody can be made happy! How I see it, because of their entitlement to "foresee" & "predict" possible future crises, scenario thinkers are often connected to big THINK TANKS-type consultancies (G), "managing complexities" most cannot comprehend.

D loses more and more autonomy/sovereignty not to top-down WEF-network-type "Global Governance Narratives" directly (I) but from (H): EU obligations, UN obligations, WHO obligations, NATO obligations, BIS obligations, CBDC obligations, IEEE Biodigital Convergence obligations, and many more!

Just Google search: "Health Minister Fleur Agema referenced 'NATO obligations' aka 'black-box type opaque non-auditable Dutch weerbaarheidsdoelen' ... Controversy surrounding the NATO Resilience Objectives in the Netherlands centers on parliamentary oversight, transparency, and national policy autonomy.

Mainstream Media (J) are supposed to be the "watchdogs of our democracies," serving mostly layer 1 & layer 2, correct?

But do they?

And if all the above isn't mad enough, decades before A.I. (K) was widely used, the LEGIT discussion of the path/road towards A.G.I.-ASI was rarely debated; most MSM ignore real, critical discussions challenging: WEF Public Made Page "Global Governance" intelligence.weforum.org/topics/a1Gb0000000LHN2EAO & WEF "Responsible A.I. narratives": intelligence.weforum.org/topics/a1Gb0000000pTDREA2

Now it gets really interesting if you allow yourself to study:

01. https://deepethics.github.io/ACCM-Deep-Ethics-Project/COGNITIVE-WARFARE
02. https://deepethics.github.io/ACCM-Deep-Ethics-Project/NETWORK/eleven-plus-one
03. https://deepethics.github.io/ACCM-Deep-Ethics-Project/AGREEMURMELISM/Beyond-Agreemurmelism
04. https://deepethics.github.io/ACCM-Deep-Ethics-Project/VCRAS
05. https://deepethics.github.io/ACCM-Deep-Ethics-Project/FLAGGING-SYSTEM
06. https://deepethics.github.io/ACCM-Deep-Ethics-Project/DUE-PROCESS-FOR-ETHICS
07. https://deepethics.github.io/ACCM-Deep-Ethics-Project/FIELD-CONDITION
08. https://deepethics.github.io/ACCM-Deep-Ethics-Project/BLACK-BOX
09. https://deepethics.github.io/ACCM-Deep-Ethics-Project/NETWORK/16-anchor-ethics
10. https://deepethics.github.io/ACCM-Deep-Ethics-Project/MUSK-QUOTES
11. https://deepethics.github.io/ACCM-Deep-Ethics-Project/META-QUOTES

And these 11 url's can easily become 10 times more... but 11 is just good enough for you to SEE why it ALL relates to A, B, C, up to J. AND especially K.

cheers,
John Kuhles 🦜🦋🌳
Dutch 🇳🇱 NDE/Asperger
CEO & Founder of DeepEthical.ai and DeepEthics.nl
github.com/deepethics/ACCM-Deep-Ethics-Project
deepethics.github.io/ACCM-Deep-Ethics-Project
Spelling corrections are always welcome as long as you do not DRIFT away from Omnidirectional, high-signal, deep ethical, mutually dignifying, corrigible, sense-making, process-oriented trajectory using the 1888 intelligence-properties taxonomy; it's for John, never boring.
Use DEDDA Skill if needed and/or study: https://deepethics.github.io/ACCM-Deep-Ethics-Project/TIDY-TRAP, which explains why you can drift away!